To Smart Investors,
Letβs talk about the sunken cost fallacyβthat persistent force that lures us into holding onto a stock just because weβve already invested a chunk of our hard-earned money. I see people wrestle with this every day. They canβt bear to let go of a bad investment because of what it used to cost them.
But hereβs the thing: that money is gone. It exists only in the past. The sole question we should ask is: βDoes this asset still promise a solid return going forward?β If the answer is βNo,β youβve got no business staying invested.
I remember a particular stockβan emerging technology play that looked promising on paper. I got in early and watched it rocket for a while. Then, the news took a sharp turn: leadership scandals, supply chain woes, and a questionable pivot in their business strategy. The share price didnβt just dipβit nosedived.
Iβd already poured a noticeable portion of my portfolio into it. It wouldβve felt painful to sell at a loss. But ignoring the noise and focusing on the fundamentals, I saw that management had lost the plot entirely. So, whatβs the rational move?
Sell.
Yes, I couldβve stayed in for the βhopeβ that it might rebound. But βhopeβ isnβt a good enough reason when the data screams otherwise. By freeing that capital, I was able to invest in more stable opportunities that helped me recoup losses (and then some).
βNever let past failures weigh you down when thereβs a world of opportunities waiting.β
Weβre not exactly short on exciting US stocksβfrom renewable energy firms to cutting-edge AI platformsβso why keep your money locked up in a losing proposition?
The hardest step is often admitting your initial judgment missed the mark. Trust me, Iβve been there. But once you do, the benefits of re-allocation can be tremendous. Your portfolio is not a museum of your mistakesβitβs a living, evolving entity meant to grow and thrive.
Sometimes, folks mistake a high purchase price for βvalue.β Iβve had readers email me saying, βI bought this stock at $300. Itβs down to $150, but I just canβt let it go. I spent so much on it.β My response is always the same: βIf you didnβt own it today, would you buy it at $150?β If the answer is βNo,β then youβre better off redeploying that money into something else.
A fresh perspective:
Future potential > Past expenses
Adapt quickly to new information
Diversify, donβt cling
This is the mantra I try to impress upon myΒ almost 1,000 paid subscribers,Β who generously fork over a pretty penny each month to read my analyses (honestly, it still feels surreal). Most of them, in turn, have learned that cutting ties with a sunk cost can be the best financial decision they can make.
Iβm not just tossing around theory. I apply this mindset to practically everythingβinvestments, business decisions, even personal life. Spending a lot of time or money on something doesnβt obligate you to keep going down the same path if it no longer serves your goals. Thatβs the essence of the sunk cost fallacy.
Listen, every single one of us has regrets, be it in investing, relationships, or random life choices. But regret, by definition, is rooted in the past. Itβs the future that matters, especially when it comes to building wealth in the stock market.
So take a moment to review your portfolio. Ask yourself: βIf I had no position here already, would I invest in this stock today?β If the honest answer is βNo,β thereβs your sign.
As always, Iβll be here, tapping away at my keyboard, sharing updates on the US market, calling out intriguing sectors, and reminding you why the past should stay where it belongsβbehind you.
βThe best Investors focus on tomorrowβs upside, not yesterdayβs costs.β
Until next time, thanks for reading and sticking with me through this financial journey. If you have questions, please don't hesitate to contact me. I might be busy juggling four kids, but this community is my home turf, and Iβm grateful for each one of you.
Stay bold, stay rational, and keep your eyes on the horizon.
May the LORD Bless You and Your Loved Ones,
Jack Roshi, MIT PhD
I completely agree. Itβs an emotional thing, to crystallise a loss, but ultimately investment pots need to be viewed holistically across the portfolio and investors should allocate money where they have the highest chance of good returns. You win some, you lose some - donβt get attached to stocks; theyβre not attached to you.